翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Judibela ・ Judica-Cordiglia brothers ・ Judicael ・ Judicael Berengar ・ Judicael, Duke of Brittany ・ Judicator ・ Judicature Act ・ Judicature Act 1908 ・ Judicature Acts ・ Judicaël Perroy ・ Judice, Louisiana ・ Judiceratops ・ Judicial activism ・ Judicial activism in Canada ・ Judicial activism in India ・ Judicial activism in the European Union ・ Judicial Administration Fellowship ・ Judicial Affairs and Education Committee ・ Judicial and Administrative Institutions Employees Union of Yugoslavia ・ Judicial and Bar Council ・ Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts ・ Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland ・ Judicial Appointments Commission ・ Judicial appointments in Canada ・ Judicial Arrondissement of Eupen ・ Judicial aspects of race in the United States ・ Judicial assistance ・ Judicial astrology ・ Judicial Circuits Act ・ Judicial Code of 1911 Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Judicial activism in the European Union ： ウィキペディア英語版 Judicial activism in the European Union The European Court of Justice has historically been an important driver of integration in the EU by performing judicial activism. 〔 Bache, Ian and Stephen George (2006). Politics in the European Union, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press〕 〔 critical on talking about "judicial activsim" in regard to the ECJ: Andreas Grimmel (2011). Integration and the Context of Law: Why the European Court of Justice is not a Political Actor. In: Les cahiers européens de Sciences Po, n° 03/2011 http://www.cee.sciences-po.fr/en/publications/les-cahiers-europeens/2011/doc/388/raw〕 ==Cases== In the Cassis de Dijon Case, the European Court of Justice ruled the German laws prohibiting sales of liquors with alcohol percentages between 15% and 25% conflicted with EU laws. This ruling confirmed that EU law has primacy over member-state law.〔EUabc – Cassis de Djion case: http://en.euabc.com/word/140〕 When the treaties are unclear, they leave room for the Court to interpret them in different ways. When EU treaties are negotiated, it is difficult to get all governments to agree on a clear set of laws. In order to get a compromise, governments agree to leave a decision on an issue to the Court. 〔 Bache, Ian and Stephen George (2006). Politics in the European Union, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press〕 The Court can only practice judicial activism to the extent the EU Governments leave room for interpretation in the treaties.〔Moravcsik, A. (2002) ‘In defense of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union’ Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol 40, Issue 4 〕 The Court makes important rulings that set the agenda for further EU integration, but it cannot happen without the consensual support of the member-states.〔Moravcsik, A. (2002) ‘In defense of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union’ Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol 40, Issue 4 〕 The most recent case of judicial activism of the European Court of Justice is the Metock case which determined that the strict Danish and Irish immigration laws conflict with EU laws.〔Metock case brings down Danish immigration laws http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3457〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Judicial activism in the European Union」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.